WildBill

Search

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
I'm curious as to why you think -160 is a fair price for Bush over Dean?

I respect your views greatly and you have a plether more experience involving political issue, but for the life of me I can't see Dean having a chance against Bush.

Clearly I think Bush is a poor leader, but I don't think Dean and his pseudo-liberal pacifist ways give him a prayer in the South, and little chance in the midwest IMO.

I'm just curious as to why you think Dean has a ~35-40% chance.

Are you assuming the country will still be divided in the same manner as in 2000? Or that Bush's questionable economic policies and quite-arguable lack of fiscal responsiblity could ulimately catch up to him? Or perhaps something(s) further?

Thanks.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
I think people are overlooking the obvious and that is you have a candidate that didn't win the last election solidly and hasn't done anything in my opinion that has increased his likelihood of winning another. Look at the dynamics you are dealing with as well, I think Bush got this real strong push of people that didn't like the Clintons and the Republicans who were desperate to get a winner. He sold himself off as being this centrist compassionate guy and he has gotten into office and done nothing of the sort. The people his 4 years would appeal to were die-hard conservatives that didn't need any convincing of voting for him.

The telling things are how his initiatives that should bring in more people just seem to chase them off. Seems the seniors he says he is helping with the prescription drug deal are pissed off about it. His steel tariffs were a stupid joke that I could see as a disaster from the start. He flat out tried to buy votes, but it could backfire on him badly. He figured that the 3 year period ends just after he is in office for a second term, but it didn't work out that way. Now he has the steel states upset at him and the steel consumer states not trusting him. Remember he did pretty well with the unions and blue collar workers for a Republican last time around, I don't know if he will do as well this time. The job market will probably be stabilized by the time of the election, but I doubt it will marked as robust or anything like that, at least not reported as much before the end of next year.

I am just saying look at the dynamics of his effort so far and look at how they build or destroy what base he had last time around. Also look at the Nader factor, people can say what they want but I am 100% sure he decided the election last time by pushing Florida to Bush. No way Nader voters would even entertain the thought of being Bush supporters and with a 537 vote margin the math is quite easy to figure. Making things worse, I think he and his brother gave Floridians a sense that they would benefit from his election, but I really don't see that. Florida is still getting an influx of NE seniors, much more Democrat in voting. If he doesn't win Florida, California still will be Democrat, New York and the NE probably stay strong for Dean. Pennsylvania will be a key state in play now because of the tariffs. Just looking at the numbers I think it is far closer than some suspect.

And I don't for a minute buy that Dean will be the same personality once it becomes head to head. He is running a brilliant campaign and a brilliant campaign requires shifting gears the whole way. He did what he had to do to get in front and get the momentum he needs to move forward. When it comes time to be serious and fight with Bush he will have those anti-Bush people in his camp, if he is smart he will moderate and work on the swing voters. I think he has a lot of issues he can work off of and everyone must remember that the fractured Dems will come together when it matters behind whoever they have. I think this has the makings of an election just as close as the last one.
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
Thanks for taking the time for such an elaborate and informative write-up Bill.
icon_smile.gif
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Thanks Lander, I like to think reason wins in the end
icon_smile.gif
I like the debate but too many people have such strong emotions about this stuff that reality seems to escape everyone. What the polls say and what the strategists say now means nothing, the only thing that will matter is the condition of things around the end of the second convention. A lot of this stuff I mention will become a lot more evident then. If you believed things now you would think Lieberman and Gephardt would endorse Bush, but obviously that won't be the case.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
WB...A lot of words but you miss the forest because of the trees.

3 talking points, for Bush.
Dean=Higher taxes,Saddam in power,Libya with nukes....nuff said.
Bush= lower taxes,growing economy.Bush doctrine on terror a succesful work in progress that needs to be continued.
Its not registerd Pubs or Dems that make the diff. Its independent voters.
NH had a poll.Either Bush or Dean....Bush by almost 2-1...in Mass. Bush would win if held today.Florida almost 2-1, wouldn't you say that was a decent litmus test as of today?
( I do agree it dosen't take much to tip the scales one way or the other.)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,176
Messages
13,564,941
Members
100,754
Latest member
itsdbarone
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com